22 Jun Quantifying the diverse opinions on actions to achieve healthy diets
Researchers, humanitarian aid organisations, and governments will all cite the common goal of achieving healthy diets through sustainable food systems. However, many potential actions exist for driving change in this direction and a unified approach to achievement of this goal is lacking across these individuals and organisations. A recent paper in Global Food Security sought to find areas of agreement on the best actions to take.
The paper surveyed and then interviewed food system stakeholders from diverse sector, geography, and agricultural development backgrounds. The participants were dominated by academia, government, and NGO, and more representative of less industrialised food systems. The private sector and individuals involved in more technologically advanced food systems represented <20% of the participants. Stakeholders were presented with a list of 42 actions, identified from previous research, that are or could be taken to achieve healthy diets from sustainable food systems. These actions spanned agricultural development programmes, international trade regulations, research, supply chain infrastructure, financial interventions, consumer-facing regulation, and education. The participants rated and discussed these actions based on their potential and confidence that they would have an impact.
Responses to each action varied widely between participants, but school food programmes, improving retail infrastructure in low-income communities, and agriculture-focussed approaches received the most support.
The food fortification action received very mixed responses, with many giving it very low scores, while a select group rated it as highly important. This, followed by reformulation or enforced limits to reduce the content of harmful ingredients in food, appeared the most polarising actions on the survey.
The lack of consensus demonstrated by these results shows that the direction towards achieving healthy diets from sustainable food systems is not clearly defined. The authors mention forthcoming research delving into the reasoning behind participant responses, to get a clearer idea of why some actions were more controversial than others. However, the areas of common opinion all have demonstrated potential and will hopefully be accelerated given this widespread support and minimal opposition from stakeholders.
This SNippet was written by Dr Nick Smith, a Research Officer in the SNi team.
Photo by Ella Olsson on Pexels